Ask from your coding context
Use an MCP-compatible assistant to ask about traffic, pages, referrers, events, and changes without first navigating a reporting interface.
Google Analytics alternative
Searching for the best Google Analytics alternative starts with the workflow you need, not a universal winner. Amami helps teams collect website analytics and ask questions from the same AI workflow where they build; use this guide to decide whether that model fits your privacy, reporting, migration, and collaboration requirements.
Start with the job
Use an MCP-compatible assistant to ask about traffic, pages, referrers, events, and changes without first navigating a reporting interface.
Browser authorization, local credential storage, and capability flags make the access model visible before an assistant can query or change data.
Before removing an existing script, verify pageviews, important events, date ranges, and the reports your team depends on.
Evaluation checklist
List the traffic, event, campaign, and stakeholder reports you use today. Confirm the equivalent data and workflow before switching.
Decide how long historical reporting must remain available and whether you need an import path or parallel operation.
Review the data you collect, your deployment, retention settings, regional obligations, and legal advice for your organization.
Confirm which clients you support, what an assistant may read, and whether write capabilities stay disabled by default.
Plan a staged cutover with pageview and event checks before you remove the existing tracking script.
A practical migration path
Read the Google Analytics migration guide Review tracking and event setup Configure MCP
When not to choose Amami
Do not migrate just for a new interface. Stay with your current analytics workflow when it already satisfies required reporting, integrations, governance, historical access, and team adoption, or when you have not yet validated the replacement path. A parallel evaluation is safer than treating any comparison page as a universal recommendation.
Questions to validate
Use these questions to frame an evaluation, then verify the answers against your own reporting, security, and legal requirements.
Start with the reports, event data, integrations, privacy obligations, historical access, and team workflow you require. Validate a replacement with parallel collection and representative reports before removing an existing tracking script.
Amami is a fit for teams that want website analytics with a privacy-conscious tracking model and an MCP workflow for asking questions from an AI assistant. Validate your reporting, retention, integrations, and legal requirements before migrating.
Keep access to historical reporting during the transition. Amami's migration guide explains how to replace future collection, map events, and validate the new setup; historical import availability depends on the source system and deployment.
Amami can run as a local MCP server, allowing supported AI clients to query website analytics through natural-language prompts after browser authorization and configuration.
Related guides
Understand the assistant workflow, supported setup paths, and the questions you can ask.
Review the product's privacy-oriented design and the boundaries your team still needs to validate.
Use evidence-backed prompts to investigate traffic changes after setup.
Start with the migration checklist, then configure Amami MCP for an evidence-backed first query.